Law Essay on Partiality Theory Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Law on Partiality Theory - Essay Example On the other hand, there are some world’s population of refugees that is either impossible or impractical to first find their way into a neighbouring country and then later from there, seek resettlement3. One of the reasons for this could be that the countries neighbouring the conflicted country are not part or are not signatories to the laws applying internationally, which are supposed to ensure that those individuals are safe in those neighbouring countries4. Moreover, it could be that the escapees would not be safe especially if that country showed sympathy to the prosecutor regime. As such, those individuals are referred to as asylum seekers. Partiality theory, as used in issues concerning refugees and asylum seeking, exists as a virtue making up contemporary or present international systems. As such, these international systems give states a right in deciding which individuals will be admitted for entrance and who will not. Still, the term encompasses the individuals, who have been granted a permission to remain by being given an exceptional leave or even have been given an indefinite leave to remain. In regards to the past two decades, issues pertaining to migration have been a major as well as a top concern to the public. As such, it is a weighty issue mostly in the UK, across Europe and in most industrialized countries across the world5. Therefore, contextualisation, which tend to be taken in response to refugees as well as asylum seekers within a range of measures, which are broad in nature, do relate to visitors and migrants to various countries in the world especially in across the UK. As such, the Governments themselves tend to seek integration of measures, which it takes in response to the refugees and the asylum seekers within those broader policies associated with migration. Still, there emerges significant merging involving several categories of migrants, refugees as well as asylum seekers in the context of the press coverage as well as i n the public imaginations6. The purpose of this discussion is to access how partiality theory is applied in countries in deciding who enters the country and how it reduces the chances of vices after entrance of refugees and asylum seekers. Where questions arise concerning the admittance of foreigners to membership and the disturbance caused to the current lifestyle as well as the citizens’ commitment share, an account for the partiality theory usually tends to give the best answers. As such, a tremendous amount of individuals entering the state either legally or illegally would lead to social vices and misdemeanours such as; tensions and racial violence, infrastructure are placed into extreme pressure, liberal and democratic institutions undermined and even jeopardizing the law and order in a country. In a number of cases, new settlers tend to threaten the capability to fulfil the responsibilities of these states, which are fundamental in an effort to satisfy the basic needs as well as the requirements of security for its citizens. New policies, operational guidelines as well as laws plethora have been introduced in many countries signified in the recent years and thus suggesting a continuity of uncertainty in relation to how the issues concerning refugees and the asylum seekers as well as migration in general are addressed. According to