Deadly Weapon During the World War Essay Example

Deadly Weapon During the World War Essay Example Deadly Weapon During the World War Essay Deadly Weapon During the World War Essay Thesis: Poison gases should be banned from the battlefield because they have fatal and catastrophic effects on humans, the nature, and they were not as effective as other weapons for winning the war. Poison gases had many deadly effects on human bodies. Chlorine, phosgene, and mustard gases were mainly used (First World War). â€Å"Deficiencies of chlorine were overcome by phosgene and they were used mixed with equal amounts, with the chlorine helping to spread the denser phosgene† (Poison). They inflicted damage to the eyes, nose and throat. Chlorine could also â€Å"destroy respiratory organs such as lungs, bringing on chocking attacks† (First World War). Mustard gas was mostly delivered in artillery shells. It caused serious internal and external bleeding and blisters which were â€Å"extremely painful that most soldiers had to be strapped to their beds† (Poison). Mustard gas also burned skin when in contact, and cause blindness (Cruxton 89). However, human bodies were not the only ones that were affected by the poison gases. Poison gases also have negative impacts on the nature. Chlorine gas is very harmful to organisms living in water because chlorine dissolves very well when mixed with water (Chlorine). Chlorine is one of the most reactive chemicals and it reacts with other chemicals in water, creating more sodium chloride, which is salt. If there are more salt in water, many freshwater fish would not be able to live in water since they cannot tolerate large amount of salt. Chlorine gas is also harmful to animals and plants when they inhale the gas since it can easily escape from water and enter the atmosphere. Animals and plants don’t store chlorine but repeat exposure to the atmosphere of chlorine can affect their immune system, blood, heart, and respiratory system. Lastly, despite all these harmful effects of the poison gases, they were not as effective as other weapons for winning the war. After the battle of Ypres in Belgium, poison gases became useless in killing the opponent troops as gas masks were developed (Cruxton 89). A Canadian medical officer came up with an antidote which was made up of cotton pads and handkerchiefs soaked in urine. Soldiers â€Å"held them over their faces since it was their only defense. † Therefore, poison gases became ineffective. There were also other problems about poison gases. Soldiers sometimes inhaled poison gases they themselves had used because of the direction of the wind (First World War). The chlorine gas sometimes reacted with other gases in the atmosphere causing explosions even before they were used (Chlorine). These problems allowed the enemy troops to attack more easily since the soldiers were being killed by their own gas. Chlorine (Cl) Chemical Properties, Health and Environmental Effects. Water Treatment and Purification Lenntech. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. lenntech. com/periodic/elements/cl. htm Cruxton, J. Bradley. , and W. Douglas. Wilson. Spotlight Canada. Don Mills, Ont. : Oxford UP, 2000. First World War. com Weapons of War: Poison Gas. First World War. com A Multimedia History of World War One. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. firstworldwar. com/weaponry/gas. htm Knapp, Brian J. Chlorine, Fluorine, Bromine and Iodine. Henley-on-Thames: Atlantic Europe, 1996. Poison Gas in World War I. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Poison_gas_in_World_War_I Wiki: Poison Gas in World War I. Wapedia. Web. 25 Oct. 2010. http://wapedia. mobi/en/Poison_gas_in_World_War_I

The Objectives of Plagiarism and Censorship

The Objectives of Plagiarism and Censorship Hashtag: #SinCensuraVigilantes (Without Vigilant Censorship) The Objectives of Plagiarism and Censorship Censorship is commonly known as suppression of anything objectionable while plagiarism prevents stealing and offering other authors ideas as your own. Censorship is common in media, films, TV, books, the Internet, and so on because they are a powerful medium of communication that has the ability to influence millions of people. The power to engage in censorship is not limited to the government because private organizations and  individuals can be involved in censorship. Censorship can be voluntary undertaking such as self-censorship of your own work (authors, film directors, etc.). Not all people are happy with censorship as it restrictions often deprive people of facts, and suppress their freedom of expression. Censorship in the print media such as newspaper, books, etc. greatly reduces the quality of information they deliver. Since a morning newspaper with graphic images of casualties of a tragic car accident can greatly affect their families’ feelings, the reading public will only see the censored images of the  accident rather than the reality of driving too fast or being more concerned about safety. Similarly, censorship of a film depicting the abuses and discriminatory practices of government offices against a certain ethnic group will likely deliver nothing but entertainment rather than truth and policy change. Plagiarism, on the other hand, is normally strict on literary works as books, journals, and so on because they are academic papers that usually contained ideas acquired from years of painstaking research. Certainly, presenting these ideas as your own is fraud, depreciation of their hard work, and breach of their intellectual rights. Want to know more? Go here: The Limits of Academic Freedom Educational Field Trip Safety Issues The Scientific Basis for Defining Seasons Who and What Deserve Respect Torture Is Never Justified The act of plagiarism usually occurred when a person writing an essay, for example, write exactly the same words or sentence that the person read from the source without proper citation. It can also occur when the writer acknowledged the wrong author or used copyrighted images without permission. The Similarities of Plagiarism and Censorship Some people see plagiarism and censorship as two different things living in an entire world. Others see censorship as suppressors of obscenity and plagiarism as eliminators of literary thieves. However, there is more to them than meets the eye. That is if one would dare see them in right perspective. Censorship suppresses the publicity of immoral and offensive materials. In other words, it prevents people from getting any credit from something that is ethically and legally unacceptable. Similarly, censorship prevents people from presenting materials that will hurt the dignity of those involved. For example, a film entirely centered on women’s nudity, a video showing a young innocent boy abused, or an article containing provocative ideas about the superiority of one man’s color over the other definitely deserve censorship. The point here is the fact that censorship, similar to plagiarism, is actually dealing with and resolving problems the same way. This is because plagiarism also suppresses the publicity of immoral written material that does not only contain stolen ideas, with an author expecting to gain from another man’s pain but offensive to the cheated readers of these deceitful academic materials.